The following forces have been identified as having significant impact on development in municipalities and neighborhoods.
Municipalities: |
|
|
1.
|
Population growth and land use development will continue. |
|
2. |
Most communities are categorized as "Rural, Village," or "Town", and so still have the option to decide how to grow. |
|
3. |
The "municipal’ scale is the key point for land use decisions. |
|
4. |
Market forces are the main drivers shaping land use, zoning and transportation — resulting in single use, automobile dependent, low density residential and commercial (i.e. "strip")
development. |
|
5. |
Municipal development typically involves the following: |
| |
a.
|
Frontage and acreage based subdivision
(i.e. "200 foot frontage with a 2 acre minimum) |
|
|
b. |
Backland residential subdivision on new roads
|
|
|
c. |
Infill of remaining parcels, with single use zones |
| |
d. |
Buildout, so all available land is occupied at current zoning |
|
|
e. |
Redevelopment with higher density
|
|
Neighborhoods: |
|
6. |
Current development patterns are often not supportive of the traditional New England "neighborhood" scale. In contrast, the Maine State Planning Office found that good neighborhoods have
nearly universal features:
|
| |
• |
They are walkable from end to end. |
| |
•
|
They have a civic core and a mix of neighborhood uses (a square, green, or crossroad with small shops and/or a civic building). |
| |
• |
They have an interconnected street network designed so through-traffic doesn’t impact local streets. |
| |
• |
They have recognizable boundaries separating one neighborhood from another. |
| |
• |
They provide for chance meetings and privacy through street, sidewalk, and lot design and accommodate a public/private cross-section of an individual streets and adjoining house lots.
Go to top of page
|
|
This site is a collaboration of
The Jordan Institute and the
Audubon Society of New Hampshire -
November, 2001 |
|